Not "to open up new fields of poetry, but only to reclaim old freedom." - RJ

Primary Works

Poetry

Flagons and Apples. Los Angeles: Grafton, 1912.

Californians. New York: Macmillan, 1916.

Tamar and Other Poems. New York: Peter G. Boyle, 1924.

Roan Stallion, Tamar, and Other Poems. New York: Boni and Liveright, 1925.

The Women at Point Sur. New York: Liveright, 1927.

Cawdor and Other Poems. New York: Liveright, 1928.

Dear Judas and Other Poem. New York: Liveright, 1929.

Thurso's Landing and Other Poems. New York: Liveright, 1932.

Give Your Heart to the Hawks and other Poems. New York: Random House, 1933.

Solstice and Other Poems. New York: Random House, 1935.

Such Counsels You Gave To me and Other Poems. New York: Random House, 1937.

The Selected Poetry of Robinson Jeffers. New York: Random House, Be Angry at the Sun. New York: Random House, 1941.

Medea. New York: Random House, 1946.

The Double Axe and Other Poems. New York: Random House, 1948.

Hungerfield and Other Poems. New York: Random House, 1954.

The Beginning and the End and Other Poems. New York: Random House, 1963.

Robinson Jeffers: Selected Poems. New York: Vintage, 1965.

Critical Essays

Poetry, Gongorism and a Thousand Years. Los Angeles: Ward Richie, 1949.

Themes in my Poems. San Francisco: Book Club of California,1956.

Letters

The Selected letters of Robinson Jeffers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.

Collections

The Collected Poetry of Robinson Jeffers, IV: Poetry 1903-1920, Prose, and Unpublished Writings. Hunt, Tim (ed.). Stanford: Stanford UP, 2000.

The Collected Poetry of Robinson Jeffers, V: Textual Evidence and Commentary. Hunt, Tim (ed.). Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001.

The Collected Letters of Robinson Jeffers, with Selected Letters of Una Jeffers: Volume I, 1890-1930. Karman, James. ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2009.

Selected Bibliography 1980-Present

Adamic, Louis, Robinson Jeffers: A Portrait Written. Covelo, CA: C. and J. Robertson, 1983. Case PS3519.E27 Z55

Allen, Gilbert. Passionate Detachment in the Lyrics of Jeffers and Yeats. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1995.

Beers, Terry. '... A Thousand Graceful Subtleties': Rhetoric in the Poetry of Robinson Jeffers. NY: Peter Lang, 1995.

Falck, Colin. Robinson Jeffers: American Romantic? Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1995.

Hart, George. Inventing the Language to Tell It: Robinson Jeffers and the Biology of Consciousness. NY: Fordham UP, 2013.

Karman, James. Robinson Jeffers: Poet of California. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1987. PS3519 .E27 Z64

---. Critical Essays on Robinson Jeffers. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1990. PS3519 .E27 Z578

Karman, James, and Morley Baer. eds. Robinson Jeffers: Stones of the Sur. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001.

Pattison, Eugene H. God and Humanity at Continent's Western Edge: Robinson Jeffers and Annie Dillard. Alma, MI: Alma College/ARIL Colloquium, 1995.

Slovic, Scott. Going Away to Think: Engagement, Retreat, and Ecocritical Responsibility. Reno: U of Nevada P, 2008.

Zaller, Robert. Robinson Jeffers and the American Sublime. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2012.

A Student Project by Tyleen Williams  

Robinson Jeffers was truly an interesting man. He loved simple things but yet was a very complex man. Jeffers lived and loved life like what people see today in the movies. He could be eccentric one minute and ordinary the next. Jeffers had a lot of praise in his lifetime and a lot of blame too, unlike many literary figures of his time. Trying to research this man is very easy and very complicated at the same time.

Robinson Jeffers was born in 1887 to William and Annie Jeffers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Jeffers' father was forty-nine years old and a minister. His mother, Annie was twenty-seven years old. Jeffers' parents ages are very significant due to the fact that there's a twenty-two year age gap between them. When you read Jeffers first portion of poems he makes a lot of references often bitter comments on "'The useless beauty of young brides' married to older men.'" (Carpenter 21) One does not need to be a psychologist to see in his poems how an older father or younger mother betrays the heroes. This is why when you read his poetry much of it is autobiographical.

Jeffers' education consisted of learning Greek by the age of five, attending private schools, and traveling through Europe with his family. It was during his young childhood that Jeffers developed a significant trait of being what is referred to today as a loner. He loved nature; he would take hikes and camp out all by himself throughout his whole life. Nature also is a key theme in his poetry.

Carpenter states that in 1903, at the age of sixteen the Jeffers family moved to California because his father's health required the warmer climate (24). It was here in California that Jeffers felt at home, so much so that he left only to take small trips and then not for very long. He attended Occidental College where he continued to thrive on nature and the California atmosphere. California became another key ingredient to Jeffers poetry; he one day wrote in a poem that California was "the world's end." (Carpenter 24)

In 1905, Jeffers attended University of Southern California for his graduate studies in medicine. It was here that Jeffers had a problem that would plague his life for eight years. He fell in love with a married woman named Una Call Kuster, two years his senior. Both families tried to break them up but they were so in love that she divorced her husband and married Jeffers in 1913.

In 1912 Jeffers published his first book, Flagons and Apples, with a small inheritance he had from his grandfather's death. During in the year of 1913 Jeffers and Una began building 'Tor House' in Carmel. This home would become their permanent residence till both passed away.

In 1916 he wrote Californians and in 1924 Tamar and Other Poems. Both were greeted with great enthusiasm. Then in 1925 Roan Stallion was published followed by Cawdor and Dear Judas in 1928 and 1929. During this time Jeffers popularity soared. He had become so popular that when he would lecture at schools, classrooms would be filled and people would be standing out in the halls just to hear him speak. Jeffers was even compared to Whitman during this time. This period of great acclaim would not last very long.

Jeffers first period of poetry dealt with his parents, nature, California, and love. His second would ruin his reputation. During World War II and the 1940's, Jeffers would take on politics in his writing. This proved to be his downfall, so much so he would be compared, by one critic, to Adolf Hitler and his publishing company Random House wrote a letter on how they did not share his views on politics, according to Carpenter (49).

Jeffers never fully recovered from the backlash he received from the 1940's. He had mixed reviews when he rewrote Medea in 1947, but on Broadway the play became a success. In 1950 Una died. Many believed that this was the end of his life also. All his poetry after her death was either about or dedicated to Una. In 1962 Robinson Jeffers died in 'Tor House' alone. He wrote very little up to the time of his death.

From a historical standpoint, Jeffers remains an important poet before the great depression (Hunt 95). From a literary standpoint, Jeffers would have stayed in good favor if he stuck with the things he loved most: nature, California, and love itself. He is one of the few literary figures who have been praised to no end and then torn down to disdain in their own lifetime. The irony of it all is that you would not know that any of this affected him because he was watching humanity in motion from his rock tower at "the world's end."

Works Cited

Carpenter, Frederic. Robinson Jeffers. New York: Twayne Publishers Inc, 1962.

Hunt, Tim, ed. The Collected Poetry of Robinson Jeffers Volume Two 1928-1938. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.

Study Questions

1. After reading the Jeffers poems included in the Heath Anthology, write two or three pages of response to them. In your brief paper assume that you are a developer, or an environmentalist, or a TV evangelist, or some other role of your choice. You should imagine how you think the person you choose to be in your paper would most likely respond to Jeffers's work.

2. You have just been reading Jeffers and your friend comes and says, "Reading Jeffers? What does he have to say Should I read his poems?" Write a compact essay summarizing what Jeffers says and include in your response to the last question why you make the recommendation you give.

3. Unlike most of his contemporaries, Jeffers locates his poems in an actual place-the central California coastline. Study his references to Point Lobos, Carmel, and Monterey. Then, closely analyze "Carmel Point," paying particular attention to the significance of a place.

Transcendentalism is in actuality an umbrella term for a wide variety of interconnecting philosophies, often the personal philosophies of individuals. With roots in the Enlightenment and the philosophy of Kant, it developed primarily in New England in the 19^th century. In my discussion of Transcendentalism in reference to the relationship between man and the wilderness, I shall primarily concentrate on two key scholars: Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau Transcendentalism will provide the framework for my analysis, rather than be the subject of it; I will extrapolate key principles and use them to analyse how the poetry of Robert Frost and Robinson Jeffers explores the spiritual relationship between literature and the wilderness. The fascination of the Transcendentalist with nature‚"s spiritual significance is what makes their philosophy an ideal framework; many key Transcendentalists were drawn to the wilderness as a conduit for the development of the individual. For Thoreau, it was his retreat into the woodlands around Walden Pond (which formed the basis of his work Walden) that helped him grow into being a self-aware individual. Thoreau is not alone in this; the concept of "going into the wild‚" to find oneself is deeply embedded in the human consciousness. This seems particularly true in America, a country in which capitalism at its most ferocious and vast wild spaces somehow coexist. This paradoxical aspect of American society is pointed out by Ramachandra Guha, who observes that "the rapid increase in visitations to the national parks in postwar America is a direct consequence of economic expansion.‚"¹ A rejection of urban capitalism has seemingly provoked a renewed obsession with the wilderness, as in John Krakauer‚"s Into The Wild², in which Krakauer chronicles how Chris McCaudless‚" rejection of contemporary society and obsession with the wildernesses of Alaska manifested themselves in his retreat from civilisation and contributed to his tragic death. The wilderness may well be on the decline both in America and internationally, but it‚"s allure clearly remains just as strong.

Despite the broadness of Transcendentalism, there are a few basic ideas common across the movement. Professor Paul Reuben (Professor Emeritus, Department of English, California State University) lists them as follows:

"1. An individual is the spiritual center of the universe - and in an individual can be found the clue to nature, history and, ultimately, the cosmos itself. It is not a rejection of the existence of God, but a preference to explain an individual and the world in terms of an individual.

2. The structure of the universe literally duplicates the structure of the individual self - all knowledge, therefore, begins with self-knowledge. This is similar to Aristotle's dictum "know thyself."

3. Transcendentalists accepted the neo-Platonic conception of nature as a living mystery, full of signs - nature is symbolic.

4. The belief that individual virtue and happiness depend upon self-realization³‚"

From this we can extrapolate these core fundamentals of Transcendentalism: individualism, self-knowledge, self-realization and the spiritual importance of nature in revealing these qualities. But how do we define a wilderness? The online Oxford English Dictionary defines "wilderness‚" as "an uncultivated, uninhabited, and inhospitable region.‚"⁴ In British society, there are perhaps few places that meet this definition; certainly it is more easy to find a "wilderness‚" in the vastness of America than in the densely populated United Kingdom. In literature, the wilderness often seems to be characterised as devoid of human activity. The root of the word "wilderness‚" helps to expand on this; the dictionary tells us it comes from the Old English wildƒìornes, meaning 'land inhabited only by wild animals'.⁵ In the works of the American poets Robert Frost and Robinson Jeffers the wilderness exists in various states, but always with this unifying characteristic. It is a landscape in which nature exists as absolutely separate from humanity and a landscape that provokes reflection on the individual observing it, an environment in which a Transcendentalist can potentially flourish.

The landscapes that dominate Robert Frost‚"s poetry are near-identical to those of the New England Transcendentalists, albeit a few decades onwards. Frost is known for his poems concerning the New England countryside; whilst New England itself may not be regarded as a wild place in the same way as, say, Alaska, Frost still finds wildernesses and voids within the landscape. These wildernesses provoke important spiritual experiences from the individuals who enter them or observe them.

Individualism is a key facet of Frost‚"s poetry. The individual is often also the narrator, personalising the connection between narrator and poet and thus stressing the importance of these specific individuals. The Sound of Trees⁶ is somewhat typical in how it is written in the first person singular, featuring an individual whose reflection on a facet of nature (in this case, the sound made by trees) leads to reflection on the individual themselves. However the extent to which self-knowledge is achieved in The Sound of Trees is debatable. The overall tone of the poem is one of uncertainty; the juxtaposition of an irregular rhyme scheme against a relatively regular yet awkward syntax of three stressed syllables per line emphasises the unease underlying apparent confidence. The "sound of trees‚" seems to in itself isolate the narrator, for "We suffer them by the day/‚"Till we lose all measure of pace‚"; the time word "pace‚" further emphasises the tension between the static trees and the forward-looking desires of man. The noise hence dislocates the individual from regular order; this sense of dislocation is furthered by how the sound "talks of going/But never gets away‚". Although it is the sound of the trees rather than the trees themselves that is personified, sound is not a strong feature of this poem; whereas in poems such as Birches Frost employs various sound devices in his description of trees, here there is little more than a touch of sibilance in "the noise of these‚". The Sound of Trees is thus intellectualised beyond being a poem based on description; the noise of the trees is less important than the effect that it has upon the individual.

The individual here does not so much espouse Transcendentalist principles so much as it edges towards them. On the one hand, the noise of the trees has worn on until the individual acquires "a listening air‚", implying a sort of communion with nature. Their understanding that the trees talk "of going/But never [get] away‚" seems to have pushed the individual to action; the listless nature of these phrases perhaps inspiring the individual to act. The individual‚"s movements mimic that of the trees, as shown by how "my head sways to my shoulder/Sometimes when I watch trees sway‚", suggesting that a closeness or bond has been developed between the trees and the man. This in turn seems to have pushed the narrator to decide with certainty, as apparent in the definite verbs, that ‚ÄúI shall set forth for somewhere,/I shall make the reckless choice/Some day when they are in voice‚". The rhyme that links the second and third lines also links the trees to the individual‚"s decision, hence showing it to be a case of cause and effect. On the one hand, this decision can be seen as one in line with Transcendentalism; contemplation of the trees has led the individual to decide to move into the unknown. To venture into the unknown in search of self-knowledge is practically at the heart of the movement; as John C. Elder remarks, it is "the teaching of Emerson and Thoreau that solitude in nature is the state most conductive to genuine enlightenment.‚"⁷ It is arguable that the individual is not particularly self-aware, as indicated in his final vague declaration that "I shall have less to say/But I shall be gone.‚" However it is also worth noting how the language of this statement closely resembles the earlier description of the trees as "They are that that talks of going/But never gets away;/And that talks no less for knowing‚". Here the description of the trees is essentially inverted: the individual will be gone whereas the trees never will. The individual will also say little, whereas the trees "talk‚" in the same manner regardless of how they grow "wiser and older‚", indicating a lack of self-knowledge. Thus the implication seems to be that the individual, in order to avoid falling into the same state as the trees, has decided to take the less well-defined path into the unknown so as to acquire self-knowledge. The narrator does admittedly only profess an intention to do so; as Richard Poirier notes, "the young man‚Ķ is still trapped at home ‚Äì restrained from extra-vagance beyond form even while imagining what it might be like to wander‚".⁸ However even if The Sound of Trees contains only the intent to act, it is an act of which Emerson and Thoreau would doubtlessly approve.

Individualism is stressed in an inverted manner in Two Looking at Two⁹, but it is not to be found in the human presence in this poem. The couple whose journey the poem centres upon are consistently referred to in the plural and without an established presence. This belongs to the doe and buck who appear individually to the couple and provoke the epiphany upon which the poem ends. Frost‚"s couple are shown to be somewhat ignorant with the opening declaration that "Love and forgetting might have carried them/A little further up the mountainside‚Ķ but not much further up.‚" Moreover the couple, when confronted with the rather insignificant obstacle of "a tumbled wall‚" declare that "‚ÄúThis is all‚Äù‚". There is discontent is the early stages of the poem, as supported by the descriptions of the obstacles facing the couple; the clash of harsh and soft sounds in "rock and washout‚" disturbs the poem. Furthermore the doe views the couple as like "some up-ended boulder split in two‚", in a clear image of violent disharmony. The reaction of the "antlered buck of lusty nostril‚" to the couple is particularly pronounced. He immediately identifies what is so unsettling about the couple, moving his head "As if to ask, ‚ÄúWhy don‚"t you make some motion?/Or give some sign of life? Because you can‚"t.‚" The stress of the latter line damningly falls upon "can‚"t‚"; the doe and the stag have both detected the absence of vitality within the couple as apparent in their apathetic behaviour. The use of rhetorical questions to frame the deer‚"s thoughts further elevates them by demonstrating that they are knowledgeable whereas the humans are not. In an intriguing inversion of individuality, Frost has presented the deer as both symbols of the wilderness and as strong individuals.

Yet there seems to be hope for this listless couple; in true Transcendentalist form, their confrontation with the wilderness seems to spark at least the beginnings of self-knowledge. Their declaration of "This is all‚" does sustain itself to the end of the poem, but "Still they stood,/A great wave from it going over them‚". Their somewhat ignorant declaration is thus undermined by their actions, as if on a deeper and spiritual level they are moving out of their state of ignorance. The couple had previously given little thought to their connection with nature but, having observed the confident and fulfilled deer, they are taking greater note. Two Looking at Two ends with then couple realising that "the earth in one unlooked-for favour/Had made them certain earth returned their love.‚" These final lines sing with a rush of energy. The couple have gone only to the edges of the wilderness, but their reflections there have revitalised them and brought them towards self-knowledge.

However Frost‚"s poetry does not consistently reflect Transcendentalism. William T. Moynihan argues that "the predominant Frostian tone is a cautious transcendentalism and a Puritan stoicism. The sacramental quality of fall typically expressed the transcendentalism, and the bleakness of winter conveys the stoicism.‚"¹⁰ The Wood-Pile¹¹ is, to a degree, an expression of this in which Frost again shies away from espousing principles of Transcendentalism. Frost‚"s individual again enters the unknown as he walks in "the frozen swamp one gray day‚". The clarity of a cold winter scene is exquisitely realised as scenery comprised "all lines/Straight up and down of tall slim trees‚", creating an austere and frozen beauty. However there is a darkness to the landscape in how it disconnects the individual from human society; he is without any landmarks "to make or name a place by/So as to say for certain I was here‚"; he is "just as far from home.‚" The individual is both isolated within nature and from nature. Richard Poirier refers to this dislocation as "the kind of paranoia that goes with any sense of feeling of being lost and of losing thereby a confident sense of self.‚"¹² As Poirier goes on to note, this instability stresses the actions of a "small bird‚" that alights before him and is "careful/To put a tree between us when he lighted‚". The bird is afraid of the human on an intellectual level; the personification indicates that the bird is making a conscious choice to create distance between itself and man. Frost‚"s individual is thus reminiscent of Thoreau in Walden; he is an observer who is shown that he is not truly part of the wilderness around him. Yet there is another human presence in this wilderness; the individual stumbles across a wood-pile "older sure than this year‚"s cutting,/Or even last year‚"s or the year‚"s before‚". This man-made presence seems more at ease within the wild environment as, unlike the individual, nature seems to have accepted it for "Clematis/Had wound strings round and round it like a bundle‚". The language Frost uses here seems to humanize the hold of the clematis around the wood-pile, implying mingling of the presence of man with nature. Yet this sight does not appear to comfort the individual, nor does it lead to an epiphany or moment of self-knowledge. Frost‚"s individual falls to pondering how "Some who lived in turning to fresh tasks/Could so forget his handiwork.‚" Moreover the poem ends on a decidedly bleak of "the slow smokeless burning of decay‚". Here the sibilance of "slow smokeless‚" reflects on the soft, insubstantial nature of smoke, adding to a restrained and bleak atmosphere in which Transcendentalist principles do not so easily survive.

The conflict between man and nature is indeed decidedly bleak in much of Frost‚"s poetry. However perhaps the most crucial difference between Frost and Jeffers, and what allies Frost more closely to the Transcendentalists, is that Frost prefers to dwell on man rather than nature in his poetry. This is apparent in A Cabin in the Clearing¹³; whilst Reginald Cook noted that Frost once described this poem as being "about knowing ourselves‚"¹⁴, it is arguably also about not knowing oneself. Despite the fact that the humans in the cabin have "been here long enough/To push the woods back from around the house‚", the mist still doubts "If they know where they are.‚" If one takes the mist to be a symbol of the natural world and the human-generated smoke as a symbol of man‚"s presence, then the tension between these two forces becomes more apparent. The mist is critical, suggesting that "they never will‚" know where they are, whereas the smoke counters this by stating "I will not have their happiness despaired of.‚" The strange evolution of this conversation, which twists on itself as it circles the topic of the humans, never becomes particularly animated but stays conversational in tone, an indication of Frost‚"s "stoicism‚". It observes the plight of humanity somewhat complacently.

This is likely entirely intended, for Frost here seems to accept that humanity will always have something of a gap in its knowledge regarding the wilderness. It is implied that self-knowledge is necessary for a broader understanding of humanity‚"s place in the world, for "If the day ever comes when they know who/They are, they may know better where they are.‚" The simplicity of the syntax here creates a casual tone; Frost seems content to accept that humanity will make its way to this state of knowledge slowly, by "talking in the dark‚" and by "fond faith.‚" This seems to veer away from Transcendentalism in that it does not care to advocate or inspire. Indeed, the fact that humanity "also ask the philosophers‚" without results could be construed as a rejection of the relevance of philosophical movements such as Transcendentalism. Perhaps because Frost wrote this poem later in life¹⁵, there is a decided lack of intensity to this poem. There is instead a quiet recognition of the "inner haze‚" separating man and the natural world, and the simple hope that in time, through learning, this haze may gradually clear.

The poetry of Robinson Jeffers even more markedly swerves away from the optimism and idealism of Transcendentalism. Somewhat rejected by the literary establishment until recent years, Jeffers often explored dark, nihilistic themes in his depictions of his immediate surroundings: the North Californian coast. Jeffers‚" poetry is infused with his own personal philosophy which he called "inhumanism‚", explaining this to be "a shifting of emphasis from man to not man; the rejection of human solipsism and recognition of the transhuman magnificence.... It offers a reasonable detachment as a rule of conduct, instead of love, hate, and envy.‚"¹⁶ Jeffers‚"s philosophy is arguable more abstracted and heightened than Frost‚"s common-sense philosophy, and his poetry is thus more dramatic. This is furthered by the influence of Christianity on Jeffers; his education was supervised by his father, a Presbyterian minister and a professor of Old Testament Literature and Biblical History¹⁷. His depiction of the spiritual relationship between man and the wilderness contains religious themes as well as many elements similar to the fundamentals of Transcendentalism already discussed, such as the importance of nature as a conduit for self-knowledge and the significance of an individual narrator. However his approach can touch on far darker ideas, and at times even approach nihilism. Perhaps it is this infusion of harsh, savage landscapes with bleak philosophy that makes Jeffers the wilder of the two poets.

That is not to say that Jeffers cannot be positive about the spiritual relationship between man and the wilderness. In Night¹⁸, the spiritual relationship between man and the wilderness is particularly apparent, as magnified by the soothing presence of darkness. From the first stanza the atmosphere is one of tranquillity; the "ebb‚" that "slips from the rock‚" is mimicked by the ebb and flow of the stanza, as created by enjambment such as "lift streaming shoulders/Out of the slack‚" and "the prone ocean/On the low cloud.‚" The pattern of tension and release is soothing in its similarity to the regular rhythm of waves. Jeffers‚" view of nature moves from the shoreline into the forest, where night‚"s presence is shown through the repetition of "dark mountain‚", "dark pinewood‚" and "dark valley‚". This presence is not threatening but soothing; the night is personified as a "she‚" and "Quietness/flows from her deeper fountain‚". The stature of the night grows and grows throughout the poem as she is infused with spirituality; "she is immortal‚" and the small presence of lights is dismissed as "the blasphemies of glowworms‚" disturbing her sacredness. Despite these human characteristics, Jeffers creates an environment that is utterly wild, as demonstrated in the animalistic description of "the slender/Flocks of the mountain forest‚" that "dip shy/Wild muzzles into the mountain water‚". The wilderness can sometimes be aggressive in Jeffers‚" poetry, but here the pastoral connotations of "flock‚" nullify this. This landscape is devoid of any human presence, barring the narrator himself, and unlike "the fretfulness/Of cities‚" it is a landscape absolutely at peace.

It is this landscape that Jeffers‚" narrator can contemplate his own position. In the penultimate stanza we see how the wilderness has made him "passionately at peace‚" and this he is able reflect on "life, the flicker of men and moths and the wolf on the hill‚" and how life in its passionate and fleeting forms is intrinsically linked to "The calm mother‚" that is "dear Night‚" and "the charm of the dark‚". Yet, as did Frost, Emerson and Thoreau, Jeffers‚" narrator understands that man and the wilderness are ultimately separated. He loves this landscape infused with darkness, but "as a sailor loves the sea, when the helm is for harbour‚", thus noting the dangers of a prolonged existence in the wilderness. This is not his only realisation; in prophetic tones Jeffers end by declaring that "Life is grown sweeter and lonelier,/And death is no evil.‚" In his isolation in a wild landscape, Jeffers is thus able to contemplate and, to a degree, better understand humanity‚"s existence and presence.

In his essay Jeffers and Merwin: The World beyond Words, Neil Bowers argues that part of Jeffers‚" uniqueness as a poet comes from how he does not just "use nature as an object of contemplation and an avenue of transcendence for the self.¹⁹ Whilst I agree that Jeffers‚" poetry values nature highly without relating it to man I would argue that the immanence of nature to Jeffers means that he cannot contemplate nature without considering the relationship between man and nature. This is perhaps exemplified by Jeffers‚" home Tor House, "the stunning, invincible granite cottage Jeffers built with his own hands in Carmel, Calif[ornia]‚".²⁰ Jeffers‚" own relationship with the wilderness he lived in is apparent in much of his poetry, in particular in his poem about this home, Tor House²¹. If the house is taken to be an extension of Jeffers‚" presence, for it is his fingers that "had the art/To make stone love stone‚", then the poem clearly becomes a contrast between the wilderness‚"s permanence and man‚"s impermanence. Stone, with its connotations of strength and endurance, is emphasised as a prominent element in the landscape, present in "foundations of sea-worn granite‚" and "the granite knoll on the granite/And lava tongue‚". These elements endure beyond man‚"s influence, for "after ten thousand years‚" they "will remain/In the change of names.‚" They hence exist for so long that man‚"s labels cannot contain them. In both life and poetry, through his attention to nature‚"s immanence, Jeffers goes further than even Thoreau in immersing himself in nature. As Alan Brasher notes, "With respect to the values‚Ķ that man can learn from nature, Jeffers and Emerson are very much in agreement; however the nature of man‚"s intercourse with nature clearly separates the two poets.‚" Jeffers‚" attention to the physicality of the wilderness here has the effect of emphasising his preference for nature over humanity.

That is not to say that Jeffers neglects to consider the place of man; he extends his dark vision to contemplate his own being at a spiritual level. Man‚"s presence is not obliterated from this poem; the anonymous "ghost walking‚" exists as a representation of how mankind‚"s presence is fading away; it moves "by daylight‚" and is "wider and whiter than any bird in the world‚". However this is not how Jeffers presents himself in this world; his spirit seems to share the nature of the landscape in how it is "a dark one, deep in the granite‚". Moreover it is not impermanent, for it is "not dancing on wind/With the mad wings and the day moon.‚" Jeffers had thus portrayed himself as sharing the brooding permanence of the landscape. What he has created, such as his "planted forest‚" of which "a few/May stand yet‚", has not endured, but some intangible part of Jeffers has. Tor House thus supports the argument of Alan Brasher that "any sense of immortality, for Jeffers, derives from the participation of the human body in the natural order.‚"²² It is not the traditional afterlife that has been achieved, for Jeffers‚" portrayal of the landscape is too dark for that, but still Jeffers has found a permanence of self in his relationship with the wilderness.

However Jeffers does often challenges man‚"s permanence in comparison to that of the wild‚"s. It is here that Jeffers moves further away from the optimism of Transcendentalism, taking a much bleaker approach to man‚"s existence within the wilderness in poems such as The Deer Lay Down Their Bones²³. Rather than unity, here there is conflict between man and nature; Jeffers discovers in the midst of a small clearing "bones lying in the grass, clean bones and stinking bones,/Antlers and bones.‚" The natural rhythm of this line places the stress repeatedly on bones; they are presented to us as an obvious symbol of death and decay. More subtle is Jeffers‚" reference to how these bones belong to injured deer that "escape the hunters and limp away to lie hidden‚"; this morbid scene is hence of man‚"s creation. Deer are thus symbolic of the wild not only in Frost‚"s poem Two Looking at Two.

In definite Transcendentalist form, contemplation of these elements of the wilderness is shown to be essential to Jeffers‚" self-knowledge. However the conclusions Jeffers comes to are seemingly not in line with Transcendentalist principles. The principle message of this poem is "that life/Is on the whole quite equally good and bad, mostly grey neutral, and can be endured‚". As in Frost‚"s The Sound of Trees, Jeffers here is moved to keep going in rejection of a particular element of nature; in this case, it is the realisation that life can be endured "no matter what magic of grass, water and precipice and pain of wounds/Makes death look dear.‚" Despite the pain of life, one must endure and "use it all‚"; this is Jeffers‚" message, delivered in stoic tones that shy away from the idealism sometimes associated with the Transcendentalists. Jeffers seems bound to accept the great and the terrible elements of life, for "who drinks the wine/Should take the dregs.‚" Indeed, Jeffers‚" ends his poem in almost Frostian tones of weariness: "The deer in that beautiful place lay down their bones: I must wear mine.‚" Here Jeffers‚" lonely individual (this poem was written after the death of Jeffers‚" wife, Una²⁴) is made all the more tragic in his own awareness of both the pain of human endurance and the divide between man and the wilderness that he cannot overcome. As Alan Brasher noted, whereas "Emerson goes to nature only for what he may bring back to share with other men‚", "Jeffers seems to prefer the company of animals to that of men‚"²⁵, as is clearly the case here.

There is thus a disconnect between the savage beauty of the wild, in which their seems to be peace, and the difficulty of human existence. As Tim Hunt states, "For Jeffers the pain of nature is its flux, yet this constant alternation of death and renewal‚Ķis also its beauty.‚"²⁶ This is where I find myself more in agreement with Neal Bowers when he states that "Jeffers says nature is utterly beyond us, though we may sense its awesome beauty.‚"²⁷ Whilst Jeffers‚" contemplation of nature leads to contemplation of man, it is not as divorced as some of Frost‚"s work can be. The wilderness remains in the forefront of Jeffers‚" mind as an unachievable state, where the promise of peace that is inexorably intertwined with brutality shimmers just out of reach.

In the first two stanzas of Apology for Bad Dreams²⁸, Jeffers reaches perhaps his bleakest in how he portrays the relationship between man and the wilderness. Here, the wild may be savage and brutal but, unlike the human presence in this poem, it is not despicable. In the second stanza from Apology for Bad Dreams, humanity is "The beast that walks upright, with speaking lips/And little hair, to think we should always be fed,/Sheltered, intact and self-controlled?‚" As shown through the actions of a mother and son when dealing with a horse, man can be nasty. The language is brutal in its description of how the mother and son "Noosed the small rusty links [of a chain rope] round the horse‚"s tongue‚", resulting in "The blood dripping from where the chain is fastened,/The beast shuddering‚". The simple syntax lends this description the possibility of it being a commonplace occurrence, whilst the plosive sounds of "blood dripping‚" and "shuddering‚" emphasise the crude actions. To Jeffers, man is cruel.

Nature, however, is sublime: "The ocean/Darkens, the high clouds brighten, the hills darken together. Unbridled and unbelievable beauty.‚" The cyclical nature of this phrase, moving from dark to light to dark, gives it the grandeur man lacks. It is due to the horrifying nature of man that Jeffers seeks to "magic/Horror away from the house‚" that he has built next to the ocean, for he does not want the awesome beauty of nature corroded by man‚"s presence. Yet Jeffers understands the tragedy of this element of savagery within humankind. Jeffers concludes this portion of the poem on the reminder that "It is never good to forget over what gulfs the spirit/Of the beauty of humanity, the petal of a lost flower blown seawater by the night wind, floats to its quietness.‚" That is to say, one must not forget the terrible truth of the "gulfs‚" that the human spirit can fall into on its journey to peace, and that the human spirit is as delicate as a flower petal. This is perhaps the ultimate tragedy in Jeffers‚" poetry, how humanity succumbs to horror and leaves Jeffers siding with the wilderness.

Perhaps this is the crucial difference between Frost and Jeffers; as succinctly put by Kyle Norwood, "Frost sides with pragmatic humanity against human abjection and unsignifiable, chaotic nature; Jeffers sides with beautiful inhuman nature against abject ‚Äúincestuous‚Äù humanity.‚" ²⁹ As did the Transcendentalists, both poets have a great appreciation not only for the beauty and majesty of the natural world, but also for its importance as a conduit for intellectual thought and development. Returning to the core principles of Transcendentalism as individualism, self-knowledge, self-realization and the spiritual importance of nature, it is apparent that Frost and Jeffers do espouse these to varying degrees in their work. However it cannot be said of either poet that they are Transcendentalists. Frost himself seems too attached to humanity; his retreat into the wilderness is never a complete one and ultimately his individual narrators will never choose the wild over human society. With Jeffers, a sharp contrast is apparent. Humanity‚"s very nature, in all its squalor, makes the unification between man and nature desired by the Transcendentalists undesirable to Jeffers; he would not sully the wilderness with such an association. Perhaps it can be said that neither poet can be qualified as a Transcendentalist as Frost loves humanity too much, whereas Jeffers loves it too little.

Word Count: 5077 (excluding footnotes)

Bibliography

Books:

Baird Callicott, J., et al, (1998) The Great New Wilderness Debate, University of Georgia Press

Emerson, R. W., (2000) The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, New York: Random House

Frost, R., (1998) Selected Poems, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Frost, R., (1967) The Complete Poems of Robert Frost, Norwich: Jonathan Cape Paperback

Faggen, R. et. al,(2006) The Cambridge Companion to Robert Frost, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Jeffers, R., (1987) Selected Poems: The Centenary Edition, Manchester: Carcanet press Limited

Jeffers, R., (2003) The Wild God of the World: An Anthology of Robinson Jeffers, Stanford University Press

Krakauer, J., (2007) Into the Wild, London: Pan Books

Thoreau, H. D., (2000) Walden, London: Random House

Thesing W. B. et. al. (1995) Robinson Jeffers and a Galaxy of Writers: Essays in Honor of William H. Nolte, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press

Whitman, W., (1947) Leaves of Grass London: J. M. Dent and Sons ltd.

Zaller, R. et. al. (1991) Centennial Essays for Robinson Jeffers, Cranbury, New Jersey: University of Delaware Press

Zubizaretta, J et. al., The Robert Frost Encyclopedia, Greenwood Publishing Group 2001

Journals:

Bartini A. G., (1985) Whiteness in Robert Frost‚"s poetry, The Massachusetts Review, 26, 351-356

Clemmer, R., (1969) Historical Transcendentalism in Pennsylvania, Journal of the History of Ideas, 30, 579-592

Moynihan, W. T., (1958) Fall and Winter in Frost, Modern Language Notes, 73, 348-350

Elder J. C., (1981) John Muir and the Literature of Wilderness, The Massachusetts Review, 22, 375-386

Wheeler, O. B., (1959) Faulkner‚"s Wilderness, American Literature, 31, 127-136

New York Times (2013) How Chris McCandless Died, New York Times. 12^th September 2013

Websites:

Perspectives in American Literature: Transcendentalism http://www.paulreuben.website/pal/chap4/4intro.html

Oxford Online Dictionary http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/wilderness

The Cornell Lab of Ornithology: All About Birds Bird Guide, The Ovenbird http://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/ovenbird/lifehistory

Poetry Foundation: Robinson Jeffers http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/robinson-jeffers

Academy of American Poets: Robinson Jeffers http://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poet/robinson-jeffers

Pico Blanco: Climbing, Hiking and Mountaineering: SummitPost http://www.summitpost.org/pico-blanco/154509

Stanford Alumni Magazine November/December 2001: A Black Sheep Joins the Fold, http://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/magazine/article/?article_id=38909

MLA Style Citation of this Web Page

Reuben, Paul P. "Chapter 7: Robinson Jeffers." PAL: Perspectives in American Literature- A Research and Reference Guide. URL:  http://www.paulreuben.website/pal/chap7/jeffers.html (provide page date or date of your login).  

| Top |